ISSN 1674-3865  CN 21-1569/R
主管：国家卫生健康委员会
主办：中国医师协会
　　　辽宁省基础医学研究所
　　　辽宁中医药大学附属医院
中国中西医结合儿科学

中国中西医结合儿科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2): 198-200.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3865.2016.02.025

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

物理降温与药物降温治疗急诊高热患儿的疗效对比

李利锋   

  1. 454000 河南 济源，济源市人民医院儿科
  • 出版日期:2016-04-25 发布日期:2018-11-19
  • 作者简介:李利锋(1973-)，女，主管护师。研究方向：儿科疾病的护理，E-mail：ggjbsgj@163.com

Effect comparison of physical cooling with drug cooling in treating children with high fever

LI Lifeng   

  1. Department of Pediatrics，People′s Hospital of Jiyuan City，Jiyuan 454000，China.
  • Online:2016-04-25 Published:2018-11-19

PDF (PC)

102

摘要：
目的：对比分析物理降温与药物降温治疗急诊高热患儿的疗效，探索临床治疗急诊高热患儿有效的降温方式。
方法：2013年3月至2014年5月济源市人民医院儿科收治发热患儿195例，随机分为观察组103例与对照组92例。观察组在针对病因治疗基础上接受物理降温治疗，对照组在针对病因治疗基础上接受药物降温治疗。观察治疗后第2、4、6小时治疗效果。
结果：治疗后第2小时两组总有效率和显效率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>005)。治疗后第4、6小时观察组总有效率和显效率均高于对照组，差异有统计学意义(P<005)。
结论：急诊高热患儿应用物理降温具有疗效确切、降温速度快等优点。

关键词: 高热, 物理降温, 药物降温, 儿童

Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of physical cooling and drug cooling in treating children with high fever.
Methods:A total of 195 cases of high fever in our hospital from March 2013 to May 2014 were selected and divided into two groups,103 cases in observation group and 92 cases in control group.Observation group was given physical cooling and control group was given drug cooling.Observe the treatment effect after 2,4 and 6 hours,respectively.
Results:Total effective rate and obvious effective rate of the two groups 2 h after treatment had no statistical significance(P>005).After 4 and 6 h,total effective rate and obvious effective rate of observation group were obviously higher than control group,the difference being statistically significant(P<005).
Conclusion:Physical cooling is quick and effective in treating children with high fever.

Key words: High fever, Physical cooling, Drug cooling, Children