ISSN 1674-3865  CN 21-1569/R
主管:国家卫生健康委员会
主办:中国医师协会
   辽宁省基础医学研究所
   辽宁中医药大学附属医院

中国中西医结合儿科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4): 287-291.doi: 10.20274/j.cnki.issn.2025.04.003

• 儿童抽动障碍康复专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

抽动障碍儿童睡眠情况调查分析

张情梅, 许白叶(), 王海岛, 陈真, 陈婷婷   

  1. 362000 福建 泉州,泉州市第一医院儿科
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-12 修回日期:2025-06-11 出版日期:2025-08-25 上线日期:2025-08-25
  • 通讯作者: 许白叶 E-mail:xbyfj@126.com
  • 作者简介:张情梅(1989-),女,医学硕士,主治医师。研究方向:儿童神经系统疾病的诊治
  • 基金资助:
    2024年泉州市科技计划项目(2024NY020)

Investigation and analysis of sleep quality in children with tic disorders

Qingmei ZHANG, Baiye XU(), Haidao WANG, Zhen CHEN, Tingting CHEN   

  1. The First Hospital of Quanzhou City,Quanzhou 362000,China
  • Received:2025-04-12 Revised:2025-06-11 Published:2025-08-25 Online:2025-08-25
  • Contact: Baiye XU E-mail:xbyfj@126.com
  • Supported by:
    2024 Quanzhou City Science and Technology Plan Projects(2024NY020)

摘要:

目的 探讨抽动障碍儿童的睡眠情况及其与抽动障碍类型的关系。 方法 选择2024年1~12月泉州市第一医院儿科门诊收治的抽动障碍患儿86例作为观察组,同期招募于本院健康体检的健康儿童70例作为对照组。收集两组儿童的人口学特征和临床资料,采用儿童睡眠习惯问卷(CSHQ)进行睡眠评估。观察组同时采用耶鲁全球抽动严重程度量表(YGTSS)进行抽动障碍程度评估。 结果 抽动障碍患儿CSHQ总分(48.32±7.64)分,显著高于对照组(42.17±5.92)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。根据YGTSS评分,轻度抽动障碍CSHQ总分(44.86±6.32)分、中度(50.37±7.15)分和重度(56.75±8.24)分,3组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。慢性抽动障碍组CSHQ总分最高,其次为抽动-秽语综合征组,暂时性抽动障碍组最低,3组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。 结论 抽动障碍儿童睡眠问题明显高于正常儿童,不同类型抽动障碍儿童睡眠问题存在差异,随着抽动障碍的严重程度增加而升高。临床工作中,应注意评估抽动障碍儿童的睡眠问题。

关键词: 抽动障碍, 睡眠问题, 儿童睡眠习惯问卷, YGTSS评分, 儿童

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the sleep quality of children with tic disorders and their association with the types of tic disorders. Methods A total of 86 children with tic disorders admitted to the First Hospital of Quanzhou City from January to December 2024 were selected as the observation group, and 70 healthy children who underwent physical examinations at the same hospital during the same period were recruited as the control group. Demographic characteristics and clinical data of the two groups of children were collected, and sleep assessment was conducted using the children's sleep habits questionnaire(CSHQ). The observation group was evaluated using the Yale global tic severity scale(YGTSS). Results The CSHQ total score in the tic disorders group was 48.32±7.64, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (42.17±5.92, P<0.001). Based on YGTSS scores, the tic disorders group was further categorized into mild, moderate, and severe subgroups, with CSHQ total scores being 44.86±6.32,50.37±7.15, and 56.75±8.24, respectively. Significant differences were observed among these 3 subgroups(P<0.001). CSHQ total score was the highest in chronic tic disorders group, followed by Tourette syndrome group, and the score was the lowest in temporary tic disorders group. There were statistical differences among the 3 groups(P<0.001). Conclusion Children with tic disorders have significantly more sleep issues compared to healthy controls. Furthermore, sleep issues vary across different types of tic disorders, with greater severity associated with poorer sleep quality. Clinical practitioners should pay attention to the assessment of sleep issues in children with tic disorders.

Key words: Tic disorder, Sleep issues, Children's sleep habits questionnaire, YGTSS score, Child

中图分类号: