ISSN 1674-3865  CN 21-1569/R
主管：国家卫生和计划生育委员会
主办：中国医师协会
　　　辽宁省基础医学研究所
　　　辽宁中医药大学附属医院
Chinese Pediatrics of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine

Chinese Pediatrics of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine ›› 2021, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3): 262-266.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of comprehensive rehabilitation nursing on quality of life of premature infants

Objective: GMs are used to evaluate early prediction of neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants,and to implement early comprehensive rehabilitation nursing intervention and continuous nursing for premature infants with abnormal evaluation results,and observe their clinical effects.#br# Methods: The 113 preterm infants,who were admitted to the NICU ward of our hospital from October 2018 to September 2019 before the corrected gestational age of 46W and were evaluated by GMs as monotone writhing,were randomly divided into observation group (n=56) and control group (n=57).The control group received routine nursing care for premature infants,and the observation group received rehabilitation nursing interventionon the basis of routine nursing care for the control group.The above children who were assessed by GMs againas normal restless movement after the correction of gestational age of 49W were further treated with group intervention and continuous care,and were followed up at the age of 3 months,6 months and 12 months.During follow-up,the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) and Gesell Rating Scale were used to compare the effects of interventionbetween the two groups.#br# Results: There was no statistical difference in Alberta scores or percentiles between the two groups at 3 months and 6 months (P>0.05).There were significant differences in Alberta total scores and percentiles between the two groups at 12 months of age,with the observation group being higher (P<0.05,P=0.009);Gesell evaluation results showed that there were differences in the adaptability and social behavior between the two groups.The adaptability was higher in observation group at 12 months old(P<0.05),the social behavior score was higher in observation group at 6 months old and 12 months old,which had statistical significance(P<0.05).#br# Conclusion: Comprehensive rehabilitation nursing intervention for high-risk premature infants has certain clinical effects on adaptability,social behavior and quality of completing action.#br#   

  1. Shenyang Children’s Hospital,Shenyang 110032,China
  • Online:2021-06-25 Published:2021-12-17

PDF (PC)

3

Abstract: Objective: GMs are used to evaluate early prediction of neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants,and to implement early comprehensive rehabilitation nursing intervention and continuous nursing for premature infants with abnormal evaluation results,and observe their clinical effects.
Methods: The 113 preterm infants,who were admitted to the NICU ward of our hospital from October 2018 to September 2019 before the corrected gestational age of 46W and were evaluated by GMs as monotone writhing,were randomly divided into observation group (n=56) and control group (n=57).The control group received routine nursing care for premature infants,and the observation group received rehabilitation nursing interventionon the basis of routine nursing care for the control group.The above children who were assessed by GMs againas normal restless movement after the correction of gestational age of 49W were further treated with group intervention and continuous care,and were followed up at the age of 3 months,6 months and 12 months.During follow-up,the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) and Gesell Rating Scale were used to compare the effects of interventionbetween the two groups.
Results: There was no statistical difference in Alberta scores or percentiles between the two groups at 3 months and 6 months (P>0.05).There were significant differences in Alberta total scores and percentiles between the two groups at 12 months of age,with the observation group being higher (P<0.05,P=0.009);Gesell evaluation results showed that there were differences in the adaptability and social behavior between the two groups.The adaptability was higher in observation group at 12 months old(P<0.05),the social behavior score was higher in observation group at 6 months old and 12 months old,which had statistical significance(P<0.05).
Conclusion: Comprehensive rehabilitation nursing intervention for high-risk premature infants has certain clinical effects on adaptability,social behavior and quality of completing action.

Key words: Premature infants, GMs evaluation, Rehabilitation nursing intervention, Neurodevelopmental outcome